Hello Simon, Friday, October 3, 2008, 12:55:34 PM, you wrote:
> Perhaps we could even go as far as saying "base >= 3.0" is equivalent to > "base == 3.0.*". i.e. if you don't supply an upper bound, then we'll give > you a conservative one. I wonder how much stuff would break if we did that. this looks reasonable for any package yjat follows versioning policy since changing major number means that anything in api may change you may use this as "theoretical" foundation for such trick :) of course in the future it will be great if people will start to use intervals with both high and low bounds -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users