On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:59:24 +0200, Peter Hercek wrote: >>> * If your code happens to have definitions on lines which happen to >>> exist more times in one source file then it may put you at an >>> incorrect location. I doubt it will ever happen but if anybody thinks >>> it is really bad we can keep the original format of vim tags too. Then >>> e.g. :ctags would generate tags with line numbers and :ctags! would >>> generate tags with search expressions. >> >> See above for other things that can go wrong with search-based tags, so >> I'd prefer to have both options. > Ok, I can add it. Generating line numbers instead of search patterns > will be quicker too. For big projects, the time difference may be > noticeable. > So what about UI? :ctags would generate tags with line numbers and > :ctags! would generate tags with search patterns? Or will we add an > argument to :ctags to specify what kind of tags we want? This option > would break ghci UI backward compatibility.
Bump! Looks like nobody cares enough to respond. Do we have at least a "general agreement" of two for :ctags[!] user interface? Is "general agreement" of two and nobody caring enough to respond good enough for a merge? If nobody responds to this I'll assume there is no general agreement and I'll maintain the patch only for myself. Peter. _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
