On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 07:34:53AM -0700, Donn Cave wrote: > I'm thinking it would be expedient to omit Haddock while building a > ghc 6.11 snapshot, per bug ticket #3531 > > >From my basic understanding of its purpose there, that ought to work out > fine - I mean, not to undervalue documentation, but the compiler should > be able to function without it. But not well versed in the intricacies > of the GHC build, so please set me straight if I'm about to waste a lot > of time untangling it in the makefiles.
I sent a patch for this to cvs-ghc@: http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cvs-ghc/2009-September/050255.html I wasn't even aware of that ticket ;-) Ciao, Kili _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users