On March 16, 2010 13:24:32 k...@cas.mcmaster.ca wrote:
> Just an aside (and shameless plug ;-): Since the signatures overlap so
> much, it is in fact easy to wrap these modules into instances
> for many possible different type classes

Yes.  I can see the preferred way would be to put the classes on top of the 
implementation, instead of the implementations on top of the classes.

Cheers!  -Tyson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users

Reply via email to