Try darcs optimize --reorder in your repo, or pull your patch into a freshly got repo. (Annoying internal detail of darcs - it probably won't use the tag unless it's "clean", which requires that any patches not included in the tag should be after it in the repo order)
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Iavor Diatchki Sent: 16 March 2010 20:41 To: Iavor Diatchki; GHC Users Mailing List Subject: Re: "static_wrapper" imports in the FFI Hello, after I pulled and made the darcs patch again, now it is 116K, which is still too big to send to the list. If I gzip it, then it becomes 44K, which is almost the right size. For reference, if I use "darcs diff" to compute the changes, the resulting patch is 2.8K. Let me know how to proceed. -Iavor On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Ian Lynagh <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 09:48:02AM -0700, Iavor Diatchki wrote: >> >> I have a darcs patch implementing the feature but I could not send it >> to the list because for some reason the patch is 150K long (!!! my >> changes are only ~50 lines) and the list has a 40K limit. > > I've just tagged the repo, so if you pull then you should get a much > smaller patch file generated. > > > Thanks > Ian > > _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users =============================================================================== Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://www.credit-suisse.com/legal/en/disclaimer_email_ib.html =============================================================================== _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
