I was getting a similar error with standalone deriving (already attached to that bug), but I didn't try it through-out. I'll let you know how it goes.
-Ron On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:01 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > It's really a bug. I've fixed it in my tree, but I'm at 2.8 and don't have > time to validate etc. So I'm doubtful that I'll be in time to get a fix into > 6.12.1, alas. > > Well, maybe I can build a patch and send it to Simon/Ian for testing. I'll > try to do that if it's important to you. > > it's bit of an exotic case because of the higher-kindedness so I don't think > it'll bite too man people > > There's a good workaround: use "standalone deriving". > > You > > | -----Original Message----- > | From: [email protected] [mailto:glasgow-haskell- > | [email protected]] On Behalf Of Ron Alford > | Sent: 10 April 2010 22:33 > | To: glasgow-haskell-users > | Subject: Re: Deriving regression or bad code? > | > | Just for fun, I tried it on 6.12.1.20100330 with the same result. > | Does anyone have a workaround? Otherwise I need to revert to 6.10. > | > | -Ron > | > | On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Ron Alford <[email protected]> wrote: > | > At Igloo's suggestion, it's now a ticket: > | > http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/3965 > | > > | > -Ron > | > > | > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 1:39 AM, Ron Alford <[email protected]> wrote: > | >> I've attached the simplest example of my code that used to compile in > | >> GHC 6.10 now gives the error in GHC 6.12.1: > | > ... > | > > | _______________________________________________ > | Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list > | [email protected] > | http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users > > _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
