-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/5/10 19:22 , David Peixotto wrote: > Probably there are some wins to be had by choosing a good optimization > sequence for the code generated from GHC, rather than just using `-O1`, > `-O2`, etc. I believe It should be possible to find a good optimization > sequence that would work well for Haskell codes.
Didn't someone (dons?) already make a start on this? - -- brandon s. allbery [linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] allb...@kf8nh.com system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allb...@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkzUtdQACgkQIn7hlCsL25VG6ACeJ3sSXoI4YLbXW3KIFVMqKqdK oTsAn23bxl0mvfdl3up69xM4qWPnklGj =TXBk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
