Hi Simon, Simon Peyton-Jones <simo...@microsoft.com> writes:
> | known problem with darcs with no obvious solution. For me, switching > | GHC to git would certainly be a win. > > I have personal experience of git, because I co-author papers with git users. > I am not very technologically savvy, but my failure rate with git is close to > 100%. Ie I can do the equivalent of 'pull' or 'push' but I fail at > everything else with an incomprehensible error message. Maybe I just need > practice (or more diligence), but I really don't understand git's underlying > model, despite trying, and reading several tutorials. If anyone has a > favourite "how to understand git" doc, do point me at it. I've felt the same for quite some time. Therefore I used to prefer mercurial, because of its way more consistent user interface. But my view has changed after I've seen this [1] introduction of magit [2] an emacs git user interface. Now, I feel at least capable of working with git in emacs. [1] http://vimeo.com/2871241 [2] http://philjackson.github.com/magit/ Cheers, Jean-Marie _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
