On 11 January 2011 19:07, Roman Leshchinskiy <r...@cse.unsw.edu.au> wrote: > On 11/01/2011, at 16:14, Tony Finch wrote: > >> On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Roman Leshchinskiy wrote: >>> >>> It also seems to make finding buggy patches rather hard. >> >> Have a look at `git bisect`. > > I'm aware of git bisect. It doesn't do what I want. I usually have a pretty > good idea of which patch(es) might have caused a problem and I want to unpull > it and its dependencies. This is easy in darcs; I have no idea how to do that > in git.
This form of dependency tracking is done manually in Git via topic/feature branches. Undoing the patch would the mean undoing the merge, which can be done via "git rebase -i". (The -i part is just for a nicer user interface). Now whether manual dependency tracking is better than darcs' automatic tracking is another question. _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
