On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Simon Marlow <marlo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Right, it could be related to this. However this change was made to > eliminate some causes of NaNs, see: > > http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/4914 > > So I'm very depressed if it managed to introduce NaNs somehow. > > Could someone make a ticket for this, with the smallest test case found so > far please?
So in principle the LLVM backend should be fine? Thanks, -- Felipe. _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
