On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Jan-Willem Maessen <jmaes...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > Yes, I'd still expect that; internal node churn with fat nodes > exhausts heap more quickly than usual. If large nodes become the > norm, cranking up GC nursery size might be in order. > > It's great to see that fat nodes finally work well in GHC, though. > When I first tried this in the 90's it was so bad (due to the extra > level of indirection & write barrier problems) I gave up in > frustration.
I just tested reducing the fanout to 8, which actually makes things slower. Johan _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
