Sean Yes, this has been asked for before, and it wouldn't be hard to implement.
What should the GHCi command be *called*? We already have :kind, which displays the kind of a type. Maybe :kind! should evaluate the type as well? Or perhaps :kind should evaluate anyway (although that would be a bit inconsistent with :type which does not evaluate the expression) Or :normtype? short for normalise type Simon From: glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org [mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-boun...@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Sean Leather Sent: 20 September 2011 11:34 To: GHC Users List Subject: Evaluating type expressions in GHCi I would like to ask GHCi for the type that a type expression will evaluate to, once all definitions of type synonyms and (when possible) type families have been inlined. It appears that I can do some part of this for type T by using ":t undefined :: T": type family F a type instance F Int = Bool type instance F Bool = Int type instance F (a, b) = (F a, F b) ghci> :t undefined :: F (Int, Bool) undefined :: F (Int, Bool) :: (Bool, Int) I also get what I expect here: ghci> :t undefined :: F (a, Bool) undefined :: F (a, Bool) :: (F a, Int) Of course, this doesn't work on types of kinds other than *. Is it possible and worth having another GHCi command to perform this operation for any types? It could be the type analogue to :t such that it evaluates the type and gives its kind. Regards, Sean
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
