|  2011/12/22 Edward Kmett <ekm...@gmail.com>:
|  > The change, however, was a deliberate _break_ with the standard that
|  > passed through the library review process a few months ago, and is now
|  > making its way out into the wild.
|  
|  Is it reasonable to enquire how many standard-compliant implementations
|  of Haskell there are?

Just to be clear, the change IS the standard.  GHC has to change to be 
compliant.  At least that's how I understand it.

Simon


_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users

Reply via email to