| 2011/12/22 Edward Kmett <ekm...@gmail.com>: | > The change, however, was a deliberate _break_ with the standard that | > passed through the library review process a few months ago, and is now | > making its way out into the wild. | | Is it reasonable to enquire how many standard-compliant implementations | of Haskell there are?
Just to be clear, the change IS the standard. GHC has to change to be compliant. At least that's how I understand it. Simon _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
