On 17/02/2012 20:10, Johan Tibell wrote:
nofib probably has, to a first approximation, zero strictness annotations.
Because most of the programs in there predate the addition of strictness
annotations to Haskell.
That's good for us.
In what way? The nofib programs have no strictness annotations, so they
won't be affected by the optimisation, so the results won't tell us
anything at all. (am I missing something here?)
Cheers,
Simon
The downside of nofib is that it probably doesn't
represent real world Haskell programs well, as they tend to use more
packed types, such as ByteString, Text, and Vector. Still, it's a good
start.
>
GHC itself would be a good benchmark, incidentally...
Indeed, that's what I thought as well. How do I test the build time of
GHC? By building my modified GHC in one build tree and then use it to
build another GHC in another (clean) build tree?
-- Johan
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
