+1 On Mar 6, 2012 11:24 AM, "Simon Marlow" <marlo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 05/03/2012 11:06, AntC wrote: > >> Gershom Bazerman<gershomb<at> gmail.com> writes: >> >> ... If everyone finds this agreeable (and I can >>> imagine no reason they wouldn't!) ... >>> >> >> That's a misleading remark: you're asking people to agree to a half-baked >> and >> sketchy proposal. >> > > I wonder if we might all stop and take a deep breath at this point. The > debate is getting a little more heated than we're used to on this mailing > list. > > There's lots of great discussion going on, and sadly for myself I think > I'm missing a lot of the fine details of the debate because of the volume. > So can I ask people to take a little more time when concocting their > replies, read it over a couple of times, see if it can't be condensed a bit > - and above all, let's be civilized. This is Haskell, and we're proud of > our community. > > Cheers, > Simon > > ______________________________**_________________ > Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list > Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.**org <Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org> > http://www.haskell.org/**mailman/listinfo/glasgow-**haskell-users<http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users> >
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
