On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 20:01, Johan Tibell <johan.tib...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Brandon Allbery <allber...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I think the original type signature is needed to figure it out. In the > > earlier example it indicated ghc drilling down into the type (a tuple) > and > > determining the strictness of the constituents. > > I parenthesis were for tuples I would never expect to see e.g. U(L). > Right, the tuple was just that example. > Data F = F Int would give you something that could produce U(L), the U for the F constructor, the L for the contained Int. -- brandon s allbery allber...@gmail.com wandering unix systems administrator (available) (412) 475-9364 vm/sms
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
