Am Freitag, den 13.07.2012, 13:40 +0100 schrieb Ross Paterson:
> Remember that there is a \ in arrow notation in addition to proc.
> So one might expect any abbreviation for \x -> case x of {...}
> to mean the same \ thing in arrow notation too.I completely agree. I had forgotten about the \ in arrow notation. > If the abbreviation contained no \, there would be no way to replace > it with a proc. Exactly. It seems, however, that it has finally been decided to use the syntax with \case, so all looks good so far. :-) Best wishes, Wolfgang _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
