On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Conal Elliott <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Simon, > > Yes, I could live with (.->), (.+), etc more easily than `arr`, `plus` etc. > > Better yet would be a LANGUAGE pragma I can add to my libraries to get the > old behavior back. > What about treating operators as constructs unless they are mentioned in the forall?
"~>" is constructor > foo :: a ~> b "~>" is variable > foo :: forall a b (~>). a ~> b _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
