> Now I'm wondering whether the approaches I have in mind are sensible or if > anyone can think of a better way to achieve my goals? Is there a way to extend > GHCi without copying some of its source code? Is there a chance of having > these > features flow back into mainline GHCi once they are properly implemented?
I can't really help here. But I'm interested in more powerful ways to extend GHCi, too. I'm mostly interested in things that will speedup development (e.g. Hoogle tab-completion, integration of testing tools). I think once we have a more powerful API to hook things into a running GHCi, people will create useful things that you wouldn't have imagined beforehand. Cheers, Simon _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users