On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Simon Marlow <marlo...@gmail.com> wrote: > So are you going to add the two missing MachOps, MO_UF_Conv & MO_FU_Conv?
I'm trying to add those. I'm now thinking that I will use C calls (which is still much faster than going via Integer) instead of emitting some assembly, as the former is much easier but still allows us to do the latter later. The LLVM backend will use the dedicated LLVM instruction for conversions so it will generate really good code. -- Johan _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
