Somebody signing messages as Joachim Breitner wrote:
Awesome. I have a MIPS-based netbook (lemote yeelong thing) and got the GHC port from Debian on it, but of course it's a just-barely-works build :)

What do you mean by barely-just-works? Anything besides:
* no GHCi support and
* bad performance due to the lack of a native code generator
is probably a bug that we (the GHC maintainers in Debian) would like to
know about.

Sorry, I did not mean that to sound so negative. I'm really glad you guys have a build for my esoteric machine at all :) I was, in fact, referring to the lack of GHCi/TH/DPH support, and IIRC it uses the old via-C instead of LLVM, but I could be wrong about that. More eyeballs on porting to the architecture would certainly not be a bad thing.

I haven't experience any actual bugs yet in my yeeloong GHC. Thanks for providing it.

--
Stephen Paul Weber, @singpolyma
See <http://singpolyma.net> for how I prefer to be contacted
edition right joseph

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users

Reply via email to