Err, GCC replacement. But, ironically, GHC [backend] replacement as well, as of the recent ICFP paper.
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Ryan Newton <rrnew...@gmail.com> wrote: > By the way, on the topic of these preformance comparisons -- has anyone > tried building the RTS with the Intel C compiler? (They try very hard at > being a drop-in GHC replacement.) > > >
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users