Err, GCC replacement.  But, ironically, GHC [backend] replacement as well,
as of the recent ICFP paper.



On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Ryan Newton <rrnew...@gmail.com> wrote:

> By the way, on the topic of these preformance comparisons -- has anyone
> tried building the RTS with the Intel C compiler?  (They try very hard at
> being a drop-in GHC replacement.)
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users

Reply via email to