My personal approach would have been to make ghc accept "Foo.*.lhs", maintaining a list of potential file format seems arduous and error prone.
Cheers, Merijn On Mar 16, 2014, at 14:13 , Joachim Breitner wrote: > Hi, > > Am Sonntag, den 16.03.2014, 13:56 +0100 schrieb Merijn Verstraaten: >> Cons: > > GHC would have to either maintain a possibly long of variants to look > for ([".hs", ".lhs", ".rst.lhs", ".md.lhs", ".svg.lhs", ".docx.lhs"]), > or look for "Foo.*.lhs". > > I’d find the latter acceptable, but it should be noted. > > Greetings, > Joachim > > -- > Joachim “nomeata” Breitner > m...@joachim-breitner.de • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ > Jabber: nome...@joachim-breitner.de • GPG-Key: 0x4743206C > Debian Developer: nome...@debian.org > _______________________________________________ > Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list > Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
