On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Andreas Abel <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1. I like Niklas' syntax better. Also OVERLAPPABLE is a horrible word, > OVERLAPPING sound less formidable (even though it might be slightly less > accurrate). We already get "overlap ok" in instance-related type errors, so OVERLAP_OK wouldn't be particularly alien even if it doesn't quite fit in with existing pragmas. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates [email protected] [email protected] unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
