On December 28, 2016 7:27:20 PM EST, Conal Elliott <co...@conal.net> wrote: >Hi, George. Yes, please do add a task, hopefully to serve as a >conversation >anchor until the issues and path forward are clearer. From my >perspective, >class methods are among the most natural and useful candidates for >rewrite >rules, since they tend to have associated laws, many (but not all) of >which >are helpful in optimization. The alternative I know (and am using) is >fairly inconvenient: replicating entire APIs just in order to delay >inlining long enough to apply rules. > Indeed, we could eliminate several hundred lines of boilerplate in GHC if we could lift this restriction.
Cheers, - Ben _______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
