Those numbers are averaged from 5-10 runs. So there is some slow down for some reason. It's not great and it's just 3%. But I hoped that 8.4 has more optimizations and will lead to better performance and not worse.
2018-02-28 17:47 GMT+02:00 David Feuer <[email protected]>: > I don't see how 62 seconds rather than 60 is anything close to going off > the rails. Did I read something wrong? This sounds more like a minor wibble. > > On Feb 28, 2018 10:32 AM, "Ben Gamari" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Vassil Ognyanov Keremidchiev <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > Hello! >> > >> > I have a small ray-tracer project: https://bitbucket.org/varosi/c >> graytrace >> > From time to time I'm testing it with different GHC versions including >> ARM. >> > >> Thanks for doing these tests! I have opened #14870 to make sure we don't >> lose track of this. It would be interesting to bisect this to see where >> we went off the rails. >> >> This is a very interesting example which the Cabal file says is in the >> public domain. In principle it would be a nice case to include in nofib, >> although I suspect it has few too many dependencies. >> >> Cheers, >> >> - Ben >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users >> >>
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
