Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2018, 12:14 +0000 schrieb Simon Peyton Jones via Glasgow-haskell-users: > I'm not keen on adding more Tick complexity -- it's a bit out of hand > already, and all transformations must "do the right thing". > > AnnExpr adds an annotation at every node. You could, I guess use > that to annotate -- but then you'd need a pretty printer for it so > you'd end up with duplication. > > Worth looking at #8809 and related tickets
these are all for CoreExpr, right? I guess I can just copy the pretty-printer code for my maybe a bit peculiar needs, it’s not too big. (Although highlights in CoreLint output would be useful for all of use.) Thanks for your input, Joachim -- Joachim Breitner m...@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
