As much as I appreciate the accolades, the idea was not originally mine. It
came from another user, about a year ago. Wish I remembered who originally
posted it...credit where credit is due.
It's a great idea...and as you saw, it works perfectly. That's why I pass
it along to anyone who asks.
Simple solutions are often the best.
-- Chuck Knight
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 8:04 AM, iPod <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> as far as the 'computer glasses' I ordered for myself...I followed
> Chuck's advice...I don't need glasses for reading, just for distance,
> so I wear single vision glasses..however, I work on two 30" Apple
> Cinema HD Displays, wall mounted 2.5-3 feet in front of me..I noticed
> over the last year it was starting to look a bit fuzzy, or at least I
> couldn't focus on them quite as well..
>
> so I followed Chuck's advice and went to Wally world and picked out a
> pair of reading glasses in the lightest correction, put them on over
> my regular glasses and tested it, then I did the next correction
> increse..I found that +.75 was perfect for that distance, for me..I
> added that to my regular prescription, ordered a pair from Zenni to
> give it a try and for $8, I have a rather grand solution...the
> displays are spot on in focus and I'm quite happy..
>
> I ordered just simple glasses for this
> http://www.zennioptical.com/cart/product.php?productid=386&cat=20&page=1
> and I see no need to improve on that or have multiple styles, I didn't
> get AR coating because the glasses I have without it, work fine for
> me...I guess I don't seem to notice or be bothered with reflections,
> like some folks indeed are.. ...it works perfectly for the way I
> work...so thanks Chuck, I appreciate all your knowlege that you share
> here...
>
> if I did need glasses for reading and for working at that distance, I
> guess I would get bifocals with the near prescription and the mid
> distance prescription...
>
>
> On Apr 24, 8:41 pm, liz <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The are real and do help a lot of people. Its just a little bit weaker
> > RX in your case. My husband has some his normal RX is -3.75 and his
> > computer ones are -3.00. He seems to find them much better for long
> > periods of the computer.
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Check us out at the oft-updated http://glassyeyes.blogspot.com!
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"GlassyEyes" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/glassyeyes?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
