Just got in and decided to take a little time and poke around...
One of the first things we need to deal with is that there are three,
basically separate, portage trees/overlays for plan9port.
*) gentoo: dev-util/plan9port -- 20070522, and 20080130 snapshots,
and is listed as maintainer-needed
*) ???: dev-util/plan9port -- 20080130 and 20091028 apparently by
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto updating Anant's old work
*) dev-plan9/* -- 20070308 Anant's old work (?)
Personally, I think I prefer Anant's dev-plan9 layout as opposed to scattering
the ebuilds throughout the conventional gentoo portage categories, but I am
not sure what the best overall layout is. If we develop ebuilds for each of
the tools/libs (dev-plan9's layout), then we can manage each of the tools
separately and still have a plan9-meta, etc., similar to the way kde is managed.
If it is OK with everyone, I'll contact Jorge Vicetto and gentoo regarding
integrating the different efforts, or at least make sure I'm not stepping on
anyone's toes.
Best regards,
EBo --
--
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/glendix?hl=en
