Thanks for explaining the difference. I guessed I had made a couple of
too simplistic assumptions.

On the other hand, would it be feasible to use a mix of native Plan9
on Glendix and Plan9port (static)binaries in the default /bin as
primary utilities and the regular GNU stuff in some sort of "APE"
directory? (something not recommended by the plan9port guys, but on
the other hand that is on a "normal" GNU/Linux distribution, whereas
this hypothetical glendix distribution -as far as I see- more would be
about proof-of-concept where the plan9port portion could be gradually
reduced as Glendix gets more and more native Plan9 binaries to execute
correctly).

On 31 Maj, 19:58, Jorden Mauro <[email protected]> wrote:
> Wmii does not create a draw device. It uses 9p for control, more like  
> the FS rio or acme post.
>
> You could implement draw on top of X11, or even the Linux framebuffer.
>
> On May 31, 2010, at 1:10 PM, staalmannen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I was looking around a bit and the Suckless.org Sta.li (http://
> > sta.li/) distribution that is in the works seems to be a pretty good
> > fit for a glendix-type distro, since it already tries to Plan9-like in
> > some ways (initiation scripts, static linking). Something built on
> > that (perhaps with a Gobo-hide patch to make a Plan9-like file
> > hierarchy) could be cool.
>
> > After reading through the different projects at Suckless, I came
> > across that wmii actually has a 9P interface (http://
> > wmii.suckless.org/). Sorry for my ignorance, but would it
> > (theoretically) be possible to "complement" the things that do not yet
> > work natively under Linux with Glendix-patches using Plan9port+wmii+P9
> > mount of wmii to /dev/draw? If the lack of /dev/draw is a temporary
> > "blocker bug" for some Plan9 stuff to work under Glendix, perhaps that
> > could be a temporary solution?
>
> > I suppose the bigger "blocker bug" is the private namespaces stuff.
>
> > I have no clear idea how the different Plan9 binaries are
> > interdependent and whether something like that would work.
>
> > On 19 Maj, 20:51, vh4x0r <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Hi, I'm interested in contributing to the project for creation of a
> >> distro based on Glendix and Gentoo. I have acquainted myself with
> >> Glendix, and also have a lot of experience with Gentoo. Can you  
> >> please
> >> provide me with some pointers about where to start ?
>
> >> --
> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >> [email protected]
> >> For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/
> >> glendix?hl=en
>
> > --
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > [email protected]
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/glendix?hl=en

-- 
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/glendix?hl=en

Reply via email to