On 1/23/07, Kai Antweiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've the feeling that we are suffering from our current release naming scheme.
> The asymptotic approach of 1.0 probably has a depressing effect. So here is a
> suggestion (and it's only that, I'm interested in your opinions): why not
> switching to a single int release naming, and treating all release as stable
> ones?
You mean like glob2-1, glob2-2, glob2-3, ... ?
Ok. That's mathematically and psychologically prettier.
In a way we have two integers, because of the 2 in glob2.
When we make a really big change we can go to glob3-1.
Shall we do this on our next release or wait until Bradley
finishes the network rewrite?
Let's do it on our next release!
From a user point of view, a change in the graphics
(like optional tiles by fede) will make a bigger impression
then the network.
I think stable net games are more important than multiple tile sets. :)
So this would be a good time to change the naming scheme.
--
Kai Antweiler
_______________________________________________
glob2-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel
--
http://joey101.net - my blog on web development
_______________________________________________
glob2-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel
