On Mon 22 Jan 2007 09:03, Kai Antweiler wrote: > I don't have experience with any of these three SCMs. > They all sound good. They all support unix, windows and mac os x. > And also conversion of old cvs archives. > Just throw a dice, if no one knows better.
I have been using Mercurial for everything for the past six months or so, and I really like it. I chose it over the others because it seemed somewhat better documented (there is a pretty good and mostly complete book on using it at http://www.red-bean.com/~bos/hgbook.pdf) and it's really fast. Here is a speed comparison between bazaar and mercurial to get an idea of performance: http://sayspy.blogspot.com/2006/11/bazaar-vs-mercurial-unscientific.html However, lots of people use the other ones as well; any one of them would probably work great. Either way, I highly recommend switching to a distributed VCS, *especially* with Bradley lacking net access. I shudder at the thought of having to merge big blobs of changes like he has been doing. And, branching becomes trivial! Just my 2c. MWM _______________________________________________ glob2-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel
