On Saturday 07 July 2007 04:01:17 Bradley Arsenault wrote: > I just read the GPL FAQ in its entirety and talked with some GPL gurus. > Technically, the consent to re-liscense was already given through the > "either version 2 of the License, or > (at your option) any later version." clause in the pre-amble of every > file. As for the translation files, they don't have a pre-amble, so they > are assumed to have the same liscense as the rest of the project. Since > every file with a pre-amble says that all changes can be reliscended, under > clause 9 of the gpl 2 (which although optional, we have used), we can > re-liscense the translation files. Same goes for the graphics.
I think you are missing the point of the whole discussion there. This clause, about upgradability, is itself illegal in most world's jurisdictions according to Cyrille. Steph -- http://stephane.magnenat.net _______________________________________________ glob2-devel mailing list glob2-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel
