> First of all: I strongly believe oss will be the future in many if not all > areas of software development. > Having said that I insist in comparing glob2 with commercial products.
I don't, so I skip most parts of the mail. >> Buy the way, ... lol I meant: "by the way". I don't want to sell you something. > > Nearly all projects that undergo a rewrite die in the process. (We > > should have listened to Steph!) The reason that glob2 accumulates > > patch-work-code, > > is that glob2 does so well and still lives on. > > What? We shouldn't have merged the rewrite?? In my eyes it did more good than > it broke. We simply shouldn't have released it again with no testing. We were lucky that Bradley wrote so much. By the way: he barely finished his last rewrite before he left. If the timing had been a bit worse, another net-rewrite would have been left useless. > > But talking about rewrite: Leo, do you understand Erics improvements to > > the > > noise generator? If you can work with it, we should merge it into the > > master branch. > > I will look into it later. OK. -- Kai Antweiler _______________________________________________ glob2-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel
