Cmake is more or less the standard among c/c++ projects these days. Not because it’s the fastest or the easiest. Mainly because it’s the most feature complete build tool. Gnome switched to meson some time back but I still find mesons lacking in some areas.
If we are going to switch I’d suggest going with cmake. I can take a look if your interested. On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 at 19:35, Othniel Graichen <[email protected]> wrote: > Qmake is for qt, right? Does it build with cake now? How about visual > studio? > > On Sun, Dec 29, 2019, 11:57 AM Kyle L <[email protected]> wrote: > >> As part of this pull request >> https://github.com/Globulation2/glob2/pull/6 >> Richel is adding support to use qmake instead of scons and gave some >> decent reasoning why it's useful to have. I don't have any preferences on >> which build tool to use, except that I think we should only use one. Having >> to maintain two methods of building the project and introducing that as >> another variable when helping people debug compiling issues seems like a >> bad idea. >> >> Since I haven't touched c++ build tools in quite some time, what are you >> guys' thoughts? scons, cmake, qmake, something else? or support multiple? >> >> Kyle >> _______________________________________________ >> glob2-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel >> > _______________________________________________ > glob2-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel >
_______________________________________________ glob2-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/glob2-devel
