>
> In terms of CO2 coal is 975 g/kWh, nuclear 22 and gas 608.  FWIW.
>


For Japan. More pertinently, the comparison with other technologies (as
reported in the Japanese study) is:

Solar Pv 53, Wind 29, Hydro 11.

Tidal and wave generation are not mentioned.

A few quick points after a skim read:

It seems a bit pointless to me, comparing nuclear with coal and oil, as
the basis of the discussion is an assumption that we need to move away
from coal and oil? I think moving away from gas is taken, as the
(currently) known global reserves are about 70 years, if I remember
rightly.

Therefore the comparisons need to be with the alternatives, including
demand reduction - which isn't listed in the table.

Also, I'll need to re-read the report but it doesn't say whether the
respective costs of centralied as opposed to distributed generation
(for example transport and construction of generation as opposed to
construction and maintenance of distribution system). These may cause
minimal differences.

On costs of decommissioning, a nuclear power station are ~£3bn
(http://www.ukaea.org.uk/news/2006/25_05_06.html). If just that money
for the future planned power stations was put into demand reduction and
renewable research now, would the returns be comparable?

Finally, it needs to be remembered any solution needs to be globally
applicable which means, potentially, nuclear power stations in every
country. Which some people may or may not have an issue with.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Global Change ("globalchange") newsgroup. Global Change is a public, moderated 
venue for discussion of science, technology, economics and policy dimensions of 
global environmental change.

Posts will be admitted to the list if and only if any moderator finds the 
submission to be constructive and/or interesting, on topic, and not 
gratuitously rude.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/globalchange
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to