On 05/28/2014 10:58 PM, James wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Jeff Darcy <jda...@redhat.com> wrote:
In addition, I would recommend considering using --xml and that
picking out the field you want to look at with a quick xml parser, and
then going with that directly. More stable than watching for a
specific return code.
Parsing XML to get one bit of information doesn't seem like a great
idea. If the script needs exact counts then sure, parse away, but if
all it needs to know is whether any are non-zero then what's wrong
with having that reflected in the exit code? That's far easier for a
script to interpret, and there's plenty of precedent for using exit
codes this way.
Parsing an exit code for 2 vs. 4 instead of 2 vs. zero and then doing
something based on that IMO is a bit flimsy.
I agree with checking if a code is non-zero is highly useful.
Thanks every one for your inputs.
I have tested #gluster volume heal command with --xml option and
it does not support it.
Like #gluster volume --xml status or info command.
Real purpose behind having different exit codes is same as above
got discussed.
Regards,
Vikhyat
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
