On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:

>
> On 06/19/2014 11:32 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
>
>> On 19/06/2014, at 6:55 PM, Benjamin Turner wrote:
>> <snip>
>>
>>> I went through these a while back and removed anything that wasn't valid
>>> for GlusterFS.  This test was passing on 3.4.59 when it was released, i am
>>> thinking it may have something to do with a sym link to the same directory
>>> bz i found a while back? Idk, I'll get it sorted tomorrow.
>>>
>>> I got this sorted, I needed to add a sleep between the file create and
>>> the link.  I ran through it manually and it worked every time, took me a
>>> few goes to think of timing issue.  I didn't need this on 3.4.0.59, is
>>> there anything that needs investigated?
>>>
>> Any ideas? :)
>>
> Nope :-(


Ok no problem.  I was unable to repro outside the script and I tried
everything I could think of.  I am just going to leave the sleep 1s in
there and keep an eye on these moving forward.  Thanks guys!

-b


>
> Pranith
>
>
>> + Justin
>>
>> --
>> GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org
>>
>> An open source, distributed file system scaling to several
>> petabytes, and handling thousands of clients.
>>
>> My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel@gluster.org
> http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Reply via email to