On 11 Feb 2015, at 12:31, David F. Robinson <david.robin...@corvidtec.com> wrote: >> >> Some time ago I had a similar performance problem (with 3.4 if I remember >> correctly): a just created volume started to work fine, but after some time >> using it performance was worse. Removing all files from the volume didn't >> improve the performance again. > > I guess my problem is a little better depending on how you look at it. If I > date the data from the volume, the performance goes back to that of an empty > volume. I don't have to delete the .glusterfs entries to regain my > performance. I only have to delete the data from the mount point.
Interesting. Do you have somewhat accurate stats on how much data (eg # of entries, size of files) was in the data set that did this? Wondering if it's repeatable, so we can replicate the problem and solve. :) + Justin -- GlusterFS - http://www.gluster.org An open source, distributed file system scaling to several petabytes, and handling thousands of clients. My personal twitter: twitter.com/realjustinclift _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
