Hi Neils, > My guess is that we need to announce packaging changes very clearly. Maybe it makes sense to have a very low-traffic packag...@gluster.org mailinglist where all packagers from all distributions are subscribed? >
+1 , its better to have a ML on packaging and discuss about the changes/concerns/issues in this area. --Humble On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hey Pranith! > > Thanks for putting this topic on my radar. Uncommunicated packaging > changes have indeed been a pain for non-RPM distributions on several > occasions. We should try to inform other packagers about required > changes in the packaging scripts or upgrade/installation process better. > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:26:33PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113778 > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191176 > > > > How can we make the process of giving good packages for things other than > > RPMs? > > My guess is that we need to announce packaging changes very clearly. > Maybe it makes sense to have a very low-traffic packag...@gluster.org > mailinglist where all packagers from all distributions are subscribed? > > I've added all packagers that I could track on CC, and am interested in > their preferences and ideas. > > Thanks, > Niels >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
