Sweet! Here is the baseline: [root@gqas001 ~]# gluster v rebalance testvol status Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in secs --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------ -------------- localhost 1328575 81.1GB 9402953 0 0 completed 98500.00 gqas012.sbu.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com 0 0Bytes 8000011 0 0 completed 51982.00 gqas003.sbu.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com 0 0Bytes 8000011 0 0 completed 51982.00 gqas004.sbu.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com 1326290 81.0GB 9708625 0 0 completed 98500.00 gqas013.sbu.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com 0 0Bytes 8000011 0 0 completed 51982.00 gqas014.sbu.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com 0 0Bytes 8000011 0 0 completed 51982.00 volume rebalance: testvol: success:
I'll have a run on the patch started tomorrow. -b On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Nithya Balachandran <nbala...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Doh my mistake, I thought it was merged. I was just running with the > upstream 3.7 daily. Can I use this run as my baseline and then I can run > next time on the patch to show the % improvement? I'll wipe everything and > try on the patch, any idea when it will be merged? > > Yes, it would be very useful to have this run as the baseline. The patch > has just been merged in master. It should be backported to 3.7 in a day or > so. > > Regards, > Nithya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Nithya Balachandran > > > > > > <nbala...@redhat.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > That sounds great. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > Nithya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > From: "Benjamin Turner" <bennytu...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > To: "Nithya Balachandran" <nbala...@redhat.com> > > > > > > > Cc: "Susant Palai" <spa...@redhat.com>, "Gluster Devel" < > > > > > > > gluster-devel@gluster.org> > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 22 April, 2015 12:14:14 AM > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Rebalance improvement design > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am setting up a test env now, I'll have some feedback for you > > this > > > > > > > week. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -b > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Nithya Balachandran > > > > > > > <nbala...@redhat.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Ben, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Did you get a chance to try this out? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Nithya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > > From: "Susant Palai" <spa...@redhat.com> > > > > > > > > To: "Benjamin Turner" <bennytu...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@gluster.org> > > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 9:55:07 AM > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Rebalance improvement design > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Ben, > > > > > > > > Uploaded a new patch here: > > http://review.gluster.org/#/c/9657/. > > > > > > > > We > > > > > > > > can > > > > > > > > start perf test on it. :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Susant > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > > From: "Susant Palai" <spa...@redhat.com> > > > > > > > > To: "Benjamin Turner" <bennytu...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@gluster.org> > > > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 3:40:09 PM > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Rebalance improvement design > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Ben. RPM is not available and I am planning to refresh > > the > > > > > > > > patch > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > two days with some more regression fixes. I think we can run > > the > > > > > > > > tests > > > > > > > post > > > > > > > > that. Any larger data-set will be good(say 3 to 5 TB). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Susant > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > > From: "Benjamin Turner" <bennytu...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > To: "Vijay Bellur" <vbel...@redhat.com> > > > > > > > > Cc: "Susant Palai" <spa...@redhat.com>, "Gluster Devel" < > > > > > > > > gluster-devel@gluster.org> > > > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 2:10:30 AM > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Rebalance improvement design > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have some rebalance perf regression stuff I have been > > working on, > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > there an RPM with these patches anywhere so that I can try it > > on my > > > > > > > > systems? If not I'll just build from: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > git fetch git:// review.gluster.org/glusterfs > > > > > > > > refs/changes/57/9657/8 > > > > > > > > && > > > > > > > > git cherry-pick FETCH_HEAD > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I will have _at_least_ 10TB of storage, how many TBs of data > > should > > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > run > > > > > > > > with? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -b > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Vijay Bellur < > > vbel...@redhat.com > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 04/07/2015 03:08 PM, Susant Palai wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here is one test performed on a 300GB data set and around > > 100%(1/2 > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > time) improvement was seen. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [root@gprfs031 ~]# gluster v i > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Volume Name: rbperf > > > > > > > > Type: Distribute > > > > > > > > Volume ID: 35562662-337e-4923-b862- d0bbb0748003 > > > > > > > > Status: Started > > > > > > > > Number of Bricks: 4 > > > > > > > > Transport-type: tcp > > > > > > > > Bricks: > > > > > > > > Brick1: gprfs029-10ge:/bricks/ gprfs029/brick1 > > > > > > > > Brick2: gprfs030-10ge:/bricks/ gprfs030/brick1 > > > > > > > > Brick3: gprfs031-10ge:/bricks/ gprfs031/brick1 > > > > > > > > Brick4: gprfs032-10ge:/bricks/ gprfs032/brick1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Added server 32 and started rebalance force. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rebalance stat for new changes: > > > > > > > > [root@gprfs031 ~]# gluster v rebalance rbperf status > > > > > > > > Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status > run > > time > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > secs > > > > > > > > --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- > > > > > > > > ----------- > > > > > > > > ------------ -------------- > > > > > > > > localhost 74639 36.1GB 297319 0 0 completed 1743.00 > > > > > > > > 172.17.40.30 67512 33.5GB 269187 0 0 completed 1395.00 > > > > > > > > gprfs029-10ge 79095 38.8GB 284105 0 0 completed 1559.00 > > > > > > > > gprfs032-10ge 0 0Bytes 0 0 0 completed 402.00 > > > > > > > > volume rebalance: rbperf: success: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rebalance stat for old model: > > > > > > > > [root@gprfs031 ~]# gluster v rebalance rbperf status > > > > > > > > Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status > run > > time > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > secs > > > > > > > > --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- > > > > > > > > ----------- > > > > > > > > ------------ -------------- > > > > > > > > localhost 86493 42.0GB 634302 0 0 completed 3329.00 > > > > > > > > gprfs029-10ge 94115 46.2GB 687852 0 0 completed 3328.00 > > > > > > > > gprfs030-10ge 74314 35.9GB 651943 0 0 completed 3072.00 > > > > > > > > gprfs032-10ge 0 0Bytes 594166 0 0 completed 1943.00 > > > > > > > > volume rebalance: rbperf: success: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is interesting. Thanks for sharing & well done! Maybe we > > > > > > > > should > > > > > > > > attempt a much larger data set and see how we fare there :). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vijay > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________ _________________ > > > > > > > > Gluster-devel mailing list > > > > > > > > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > > > > > > > > http://www.gluster.org/ mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > Gluster-devel mailing list > > > > > > > > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > > > > > > > > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > Gluster-devel mailing list > > > > > > > > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > > > > > > > > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Gluster-devel mailing list > > > > > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > > > > > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Gluster-devel mailing list > > > > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > > > > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel