Emmanuel Dreyfus <m...@netbsd.org> wrote: > - tests/basic/ec/ > This worked but with rare spurious faiures. They are the same as on > Linux and work have been done, hence I think I should probably enable > again, but it may have rotten a lot. I have to give it a try
It is rather grim. NetBSD ec tests went from rare spurious failures a few weeks ago to complete reproductible failure (see below). Anyone interested looking at it? A lot of errors ae preceded by Input/Output error messages that suggest a common root. Test Summary Report ------------------- ./tests/basic/ec/ec-3-1.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 217 Failed: 4) Failed tests: 133-134, 138-139 ./tests/basic/ec/ec-4-1.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 253 Failed: 6) Failed tests: 152-153, 157-158, 162-163 ./tests/basic/ec/ec-5-1.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 289 Failed: 8) Failed tests: 171-172, 176-177, 181-182, 186-187 ./tests/basic/ec/ec-readdir.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 9 Failed: 1) Failed test: 9 ./tests/basic/ec/quota.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 24 Failed: 1) Failed test: 24 ./tests/basic/ec/self-heal.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 257 Failed: 5) Failed tests: 184, 195, 206, 217, 228 Files=15, Tests=2711, 3306 wallclock secs -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz m...@netbsd.org _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
