On 15 Jun 2015 19:23, "Kaushal M" <kshlms...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I like this idea. One tweak I'd make is to introduce the idea of > > Verified+1 for smoke and Verified+2 for regressions. Why? Because it > > seems like a lot of people won't even review a patch until they can > > see that it has been sanity-checked. If we formally require review > > before verification, and informally need verification before review, > > we're stuck. > > I should have made this clearer in the steps I listed. > Under the 2nd step (I should have numbered as well), I've mentioned > that Zuul will report back the status of smoke/pre-review tests. This > is the Verified+1. Though I was thinking of using different flags, we > can use Verified it self to serve both pre and post review checks. I would like to see two different flags, one for smoke and other for regression. Off late, we have seen cases where votes get overridden. > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
