Indeed , no feedback on QA releases happens between minor versions.
I do think , there is no point to keep alpha/beta releases between minor
versions , but we can do that for Major as Kaleb mentioned.

--Humble


On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kkeit...@redhat.com>
wrote:

> On 08/05/2015 08:45 AM, Raghavendra Bhat wrote:
> > On 08/05/2015 05:57 PM, Humble Devassy Chirammal wrote:
> >> Hi Ragavendra,
> >>
> >> How many beta releases hit for each minor release ? and the gap
> >> between these releases ?
> >>
> >> --Humble
> >>
> >
> > I am not sure about the beta releases. As per my understanding there are
> > no beta releases happening in release-3.5 branch and also the latest
> > release-3.7 branch. I was doing beta releases for release-3.6 branch.
> > But I am also thinking of moving away from it and make 3.6.5 directly
> > (and also future release-3.6 releases).
>
> We get zero feedback from alphas and betas. Nobody has complained about
> the lack of them.
>
> IMO we should still to alpha and beta for x.y.0 releases though.
>
> --
>
> Kaleb
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> Gluster-devel@gluster.org
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Reply via email to