Hi All,
We have encountered a spate of regressions in recent 3.7.x releases. The
3.7.x maintainers are facing additional burdens to ensure functional,
performance and upgrade correctness. I feel component maintainers should
own these aspects of stability as we own the components and understand
our components better than anybody else. In order to have more active
participation from maintainers for every release going forward, I
propose this process:
1. All component maintainers will need to provide an explicit ack about
the content and quality of their respective components before a release
is tagged.
2. A release will not be tagged if any component is not acked by a
maintainer.
3. Release managers will co-ordinate getting acks from maintainers and
perform necessary housekeeping (closing bugs etc.).
This is not entirely new and a part of this process has been outlined in
the Guidelines for Maintainers [1] document. I am inclined to enforce
this process with more vigor to ensure that we do better on quality &
stability.
Thoughts, questions and feedback about the process are very welcome!
Thanks,
Vijay
[1]
http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Guidelines_For_Maintainers
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
