Oh ok. I see that in ./tests/basic/gfapi/bug1291259.c the function glfs_upcall_get_reason() is causing segmentation fault, as per the stderr messages. Adding Niels, if he wants to take a look at this.
We can mark the test bad by raising a Bz i suppose. Thanks, Poornima ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhan...@redhat.com> > To: "Poornima Gurusiddaiah" <pguru...@redhat.com> > Cc: "Soumya Koduri" <skod...@redhat.com>, "Pranith Karampuri" > <pkara...@redhat.com> > Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 1:49:27 AM > Subject: Re: Regarding a consistent gfapi .t failure > No unfortunately I had no success with recreating the failure either on my > setup or on a borrowed centos from jenkins cluster. > Ok this is good information. I didn't know it had failed on other patches > too. I thought it's only with my patch. > Can this be marked as a bad test in that case? > -Krutika > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah < pguru...@redhat.com > > wrote: > > Hi, > > > Are you able consistently reproduce this on your local system as well? If > > so > > can you share the system? > > > I see that it has failed for many other patches as well. > > http://fstat.gluster.org/weeks/1/failure/34 > > > Regards, > > > Poornima > > > > From: "Krutika Dhananjay" < kdhan...@redhat.com > > > > > > > To: "Poornima Gurusiddaiah" < pguru...@redhat.com >, "Soumya Koduri" < > > > skod...@redhat.com > > > > > > > Cc: "Pranith Karampuri" < pkara...@redhat.com > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 8:47:57 AM > > > > > > Subject: Regarding a consistent gfapi .t failure > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > The test tests/basic/gfapi/bug1291259.t seems to be failing consistently > > > on > > > my 3.9 backport http://review.gluster.org/#/c/16046/ > > > > > > The patch itself makes changes only in compound fops, so it is unlikely > > > that > > > the failure is caused by the patch itself. > > > > > > Here's a sample failure run: > > > https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/2134/console > > > > > > I ran the test on my laptop and it passes consistently. > > > > > > I ran the test on a borrowed centos slave and it passes there as well. > > > > > > I looked at the logfile bug1291259.log from the archived build failure > > > logs > > > > > > but there are no failures. > > > > > > If you have any ideas on how to proceed further, could you please suggest > > > the > > > same? > > > > > > -Krutika > > >
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel