On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 11:22:16PM -0500, Vijay Bellur wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > We would like to make it as easy as possible for other projects to get > > > in touch with the GEDI team. For that, we propose a mailinglist > > > (integrat...@gluster.org) dedicated for engineers that are involved in > > > Gluster integrations. The main gluster-devel list will most likely > > > contain too much traffic for developers that do not care about the core > > > of glusterfs. The new mailinglist may be configured to have its emails > > > *also* sent to the gluster-devel list so that a wider audience is > > > reached. > > > > > > Please let us know if there are any concerns, questions or other > > > feedback. > > > > > > > > I like the idea of routing emails from integration on gluster-devel for > > reaching out to a broader audience. Can we get it done before traffic > > starts to increase on integration ML? > > We can do this, but Nigel expressed that he doesnt want it: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409790#c1 > > It's the responsibility of people on the list to CC emails that are > potentially interesting to gluster-devel@. Wholesale CCing will only > add to the noise on gluster-devel@ > > > I do not have a strong preference for one or the other. What do others > think? > > In my opinion, the core of gluster benefits from being involved in discussions related to gfapi and related interfaces. Hence I have a strong preference to have all emails on integration ML be routed to gluster-devel. Doing it this way will prevent all core gluster developers from signing up for yet another ML. Thanks, Vijay
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel