Nigel was kind enough to kick off a glusto run on 3.12 head a couple of
days back. The status can be seen here [1].
The run failed, but managed to get past what Glusto does on master (see
[2]). Not that this is a consolation, but just stating the fact.
The run [1] failed at,
17:05:57
functional/bvt/test_cvt.py::TestGlusterHealSanity_dispersed_glusterfs::test_self_heal_when_io_in_progress
FAILED
The test case failed due to,
17:10:28 E AssertionError: ('Volume %s : All process are not
online', 'testvol_dispersed')
The test case can be seen here [3], and the reason for failure is that
Glusto did not wait long enough for the down brick to come up (it waited
for 10 seconds, but the brick came up after 12 seconds or within the
same second as the test for it being up. The log snippets pointing to
this problem are here [4]. In short there was no real bug or issue that
caused the failure as yet.
Glusto as a gating factor for this release was desirable, but having got
this far on 3.12 does help.
@nigel, we could try post increasing the timeout between bringing the
brick up to checking if it is up, and try another run, let me know if
that works, and what is needed from me to get this going.
Shyam
[1] Glusto 3.12 run:
https://ci.centos.org/view/Gluster/job/gluster_glusto/365/
[2] Glusto on master:
https://ci.centos.org/view/Gluster/job/gluster_glusto/360/testReport/functional.bvt.test_cvt/
[3] Failed test case:
https://ci.centos.org/view/Gluster/job/gluster_glusto/365/testReport/functional.bvt.test_cvt/TestGlusterHealSanity_dispersed_glusterfs/test_self_heal_when_io_in_progress/
[4] Log analysis pointing to the failed check:
https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/znTPiFLrc2~vsWuoYRToZA
"Releases are made better together"
_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
