All I know is pump translator is written long back to support 'replace-brick' without data-loss in distributed setup too. But we figured out pump is not maintainable along the way, and said you can't do a replace-brick in distributed volume type.
https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/commit/acdeed002d30209e0a058c2df0346d 4f16c08994 I don't see that its used now, so looks like we can remove this test. -Amar On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 10:02 AM, Atin Mukherjee <amukh...@redhat.com> wrote: > Pranith, > > I see you're the author of the test in $Subj. Now while I was working on a > patch https://review.gluster.org/#/c/18226/ to disallow replace brick > operations on dist only volumes the patch failed the regression on this > test as the test actually uses replace brick on a distribute only volume > which IMO is wrong as then this would always end up in to data loss > situation. I'd need some context here to understand the expectation of this > test before doing any modifications. > > ~Atin > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@gluster.org > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > -- Amar Tumballi (amarts)
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
