Sunny/Rafi, I was trying to debug regression failures on [1]. Note that patch [1] only disables usage of anonymous fds on readv. So, I tried the same test disabling performance.open-behind
[root@rhs-client27 glusterfs]# git diff diff --git a/tests/bugs/snapshot/bug-1167580-set-proper-uid-and-gid-during-nfs-access.t b/tests/bugs/snapshot/bug-1167580-set-proper-uid-and-gid-during-nfs-access.t index 3776451..cedf96b 100644 --- a/tests/bugs/snapshot/bug-1167580-set-proper-uid-and-gid-during-nfs-access.t +++ b/tests/bugs/snapshot/bug-1167580-set-proper-uid-and-gid-during-nfs-access.t @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ TEST $CLI volume start $V0 EXPECT_WITHIN $NFS_EXPORT_TIMEOUT "1" is_nfs_export_available TEST glusterfs -s $H0 --volfile-id $V0 $M0 TEST mount_nfs $H0:/$V0 $N0 nolock +TEST $CLI volume set $V0 performance.open-behind off # Create 2 user user1=$(get_new_user) With the above change, I can see consistent failures of the test just like observed in [1]. TEST 23 (line 154): Y check_if_permitted eeefadc /mnt/glusterfs/0/.snaps/snap2/file3 cat su: warning: cannot change directory to /tmp/tmp.eaKBKS0lfM/eeefadc: No such file or directory cat: /mnt/glusterfs/0/.snaps/snap2/file3: Permission denied su: warning: cannot change directory to /tmp/tmp.eaKBKS0lfM/eeefadc: No such file or directory cat: /mnt/glusterfs/0/.snaps/snap2/file3: Permission denied su: warning: cannot change directory to /tmp/tmp.eaKBKS0lfM/eeefadc: No such file or directory cat: /mnt/glusterfs/0/.snaps/snap2/file3: Permission denied su: warning: cannot change directory to /tmp/tmp.eaKBKS0lfM/eeefadc: No such file or directory cat: /mnt/glusterfs/0/.snaps/snap2/file3: Permission denied Test Summary Report ------------------- ./tests/bugs/snapshot/bug-1167580-set-proper-uid-and-gid-during-nfs-access.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 46 Failed: 1) Failed test: 23 I had a feeling this test fails spuriously and the spurious nature is tied with whether open-behind uses an anonymous fd or a regular fd for read. @Sunny, This test is blocking two of my patches - [1] and [2]. Can I mark this test as bad and proceed with my work on [1] and [2]? [1] https://review.gluster.org/20511 [2] https://review.gluster.org/20428 regards, Raghavendra
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel